In security clearance law, an isolated mistake—such as a past debt or a youthful indiscretion—does not automatically result in a denial. Adjudicators are required to apply the Whole Person Concept, evaluating an applicant's entire life story rather than focusing solely on a single "red flag."

The 9 Factors of Evaluation

Under SEAD 4, adjudicators must weigh the following nine factors when deciding whether to grant or revoke a clearance:

-The nature, extent, and seriousness of the conduct;

-The circumstances surrounding the conduct, to include knowledgeable participation;

-The frequency and recency of the conduct;

-The individual’s age and maturity at the time of the conduct;

-The extent to which participation was voluntary;

-The presence or absence of rehabilitation and other permanent behavioral changes;

-The motivation for the conduct;

-The potential for pressure, coercion, exploitation, or duress; and

-The likelihood of continuation or recurrence.

How We Apply the Whole Person Concept

We don't just hope for the best; we build a narrative that satisfies these nine factors. By highlighting your professional achievements, community involvement, and the "passage of time" since any negative incidents, we demonstrate that you are a reliable, trustworthy, and stable candidate for national security access.

The Whole Person Concept is not an excuse—it is a legal standard that requires a skilled presentation of evidence.

If you are facing a security clearance concern, contact The Law Office of Asya Hogue, Esq., for a free consultation at asya@securityclearancepro.com or text or call (904) 884-5891.